Air
+6
ZeeX10
Canadian Empire
HJH1990
Poik12
Admin
GnuTrip
10 posters
Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Air
They cancelled it because Brezhnev was a conservative and didn't fancy Khrushchev's fancy science toys. I did however hear the Hull of one was for sale in the 90s. Dont know what has happend to that.Poik12 wrote:Admin wrote:Im talking AN-26 sized Ekranoplans set up in a LUN configuration, antiship missiles mounted on top.Poik12 wrote:Admin wrote:What are the possibilities of maintaining a small fleet of Ekranoplans and wing in ground effect aircraft?
I was talking to a friend of mine about that, the Iranians have made their own Bavar-2 Ekranoplans (little two-seaters).
They're good for coastal work, perhaps some light ASW but not much else.
It could work, but the Soviets cancelled that project for a reason:
It couldn't cross oceans with waves higher than 5M.
ofc, if we just want say, 10 of these ready to launch when an enemy navy approaches, I'd say go for it. (the propellers will make it easier to hunt subs undetected)
It's just not a very good long range assault vessel.
Canadian Empire- Posts : 106
Join date : 2012-07-25
Re: Air
Id say we should look into a fixed wing aircraft that has or can have some offensive capability. Nosegun, bombs, rocket pods, something.NORhunter1873 wrote:helo's is most important, but atleast 1 fix wing aircraft with some capasity is also important to move shit from b-c and cargo ships are important to move shit from a-b
Also if possible get ahold of Hinds. they are an APCs with rotors.
>Small arms fire
>Laugh and hose with gun fire.
Canadian Empire- Posts : 106
Join date : 2012-07-25
Re: Air
Canadian Empire wrote:Id say we should look into a fixed wing aircraft that has or can have some offensive capability. Nosegun, bombs, rocket pods, something.NORhunter1873 wrote:helo's is most important, but atleast 1 fix wing aircraft with some capasity is also important to move shit from b-c and cargo ships are important to move shit from a-b
Also if possible get ahold of Hinds. they are an APCs with rotors.
>Small arms fire
>Laugh and hose with gun fire.
I like the idea. but it would have to be modular. and and another thing, i dont think it would hurt to buy up some bronco-esque fixed wings
imonaboat- Posts : 162
Join date : 2012-07-25
Location : Gods country
Re: Air
Yah but all im saying is if we go fixed wing we need some sort of offensive capability. A Cessna full of neckbeards dual wielding nuggets wont cut it sadly.imonaboat wrote:Canadian Empire wrote:Id say we should look into a fixed wing aircraft that has or can have some offensive capability. Nosegun, bombs, rocket pods, something.NORhunter1873 wrote:helo's is most important, but atleast 1 fix wing aircraft with some capasity is also important to move shit from b-c and cargo ships are important to move shit from a-b
Also if possible get ahold of Hinds. they are an APCs with rotors.
>Small arms fire
>Laugh and hose with gun fire.
I like the idea. but it would have to be modular. and and another thing, i dont think it would hurt to buy up some bronco-esque fixed wings
Canadian Empire- Posts : 106
Join date : 2012-07-25
Re: Air
Canadian Empire wrote:
A Cessna full of neckbeards dual wielding nuggets AND two mounted side-gunners with a couple fuel bombs on board
FTFY
Pendrake- Posts : 242
Join date : 2012-07-25
Location : Virginia Beach
Re: Air
Just buy or steal some manpads for defense. Planes and helis require alot support in terms of fuel, maintenance etc. Probably much more than small unit would be able to procure / afford.
kteam- Posts : 13
Join date : 2012-08-04
Location : Not guaranteed
Re: Air
kteam wrote:Just buy or steal some manpads for defense. Planes and helis require alot support in terms of fuel, maintenance etc. Probably much more than small unit would be able to procure / afford.
In the next few years, it's looking like consumer-level drones might be the best option for reconnaissance anyway. A little ingenuity can make them into bombers or gunners, which leaves transport to some other method (like the boat or mobile island).
Pendrake- Posts : 242
Join date : 2012-07-25
Location : Virginia Beach
Re: Air
Canadian Empire wrote:Yah but all im saying is if we go fixed wing we need some sort of offensive capability. A Cessna full of neckbeards dual wielding nuggets wont cut it sadly.imonaboat wrote:Canadian Empire wrote:Id say we should look into a fixed wing aircraft that has or can have some offensive capability. Nosegun, bombs, rocket pods, something.NORhunter1873 wrote:helo's is most important, but atleast 1 fix wing aircraft with some capasity is also important to move shit from b-c and cargo ships are important to move shit from a-b
Also if possible get ahold of Hinds. they are an APCs with rotors.
>Small arms fire
>Laugh and hose with gun fire.
I like the idea. but it would have to be modular. and and another thing, i dont think it would hurt to buy up some bronco-esque fixed wings
well that's why i suggested the bronco's. its was designed for CAS, but they were so versatile that they ended using them for sf airborne ops, interdiction, recon, and a few other things.
also please excuse the horrible writing im sick as hell.
imonaboat- Posts : 162
Join date : 2012-07-25
Location : Gods country
Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Page 2 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|